Your Position: King Quenson Group > News > Industry News
Glyphosate: No Change Proposed To Hazard Classification!
2022/6/10 17:34:42

Glyphosate: No Change Proposed To Hazard Classification!

ECHA's Committee for Risk Assessment (RAC) agrees to keep glyphosate’s current classification as causing serious eye damage and being toxic to aquatic life. Based on a wide-ranging review of scientific evidence, the committee again concludes that classifying glyphosate as a carcinogen is not justified.

Helsinki, 30 May 2022 - RAC has concluded that the existing classifications for glyphosate as a substance that causes serious eye damage and is toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects should be retained. The committee found that the available scientific evidence did not meet the criteria to classify glyphosate for specific target organ toxicity, or as a carcinogenic, mutagenic or reprotoxic substance.

The committee assessed glyphosate’s hazardous properties against criteria in the Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) Regulation. They considered an extensive volume of scientific data and many hundreds of comments received during consultations when forming their opinion.

The new RAC opinion is consistent with the proposal of the four Member States currently assessing glyphosate: Sweden, France, Hungary and The Netherlands as well as with RAC’s 2017 opinion.

The adopted opinion will be published on ECHA’s website and sent to the European Commission and European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) by mid-August. EFSA will carry out its risk assessment of glyphosate, with this expected to be ready in July 2023.

The European Commission will analyse EFSA’s conclusions and the renewal assessment report that was prepared by Sweden, France, Hungary and The Netherlands. The Commission will then put forward a renewal report and a draft regulation to Member States on whether the approval of glyphosate can be renewed or not.


Harmonised classification and labelling

Together with the Commission and the Member States, ECHA implements the harmonised classification and labelling (CLH) process for hazardous substances. The aim is to protect people’s health and the environment from those hazards that matter the most.

Harmonised classification and labelling focuses only on the hazardous properties of the substance: its potential to cause harm. It does not assess the exposure of people or the environment to glyphosate. This will be part of the peer review of the risk assessment done by EFSA.

Committee for Risk Assessment (RAC)

The Committee for Risk Assessment is made up of scientists nominated by EU Member States and appointed by ECHA’s Management Board in their personal capacity. The committee has observers from different EU organisations representing civil society, academia and industry. Together, they are responsible for making scientific opinions that are then used by the European Commission and EU Member States when deciding how chemical risks need to be controlled.


The most critical point in the EU re-evaluation process of glyphosate is that the RAC’s conclusion is same as the previous conclusion of US EPA, FAO/WHO and JMPR. It was confirmed that glyphosate should not be classified as a carcinogenic, mutagenic or reprotoxic substance.

But because International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) characterized glyphosate and glyphosate formulations as possibly carcinogenic to humans in 2015, it was causing widespread concern about the safety of glyphosate worldwide.


Due to the continuous disputes, the re-evaluation of glyphosate in the EU has continued to advance according to the adjusted new work plan.


New work plan:


End of September 2022

AGG will send another updated reassessment dossier to EFSA based on the established action plan and after evaluating the additional information provided by the GRG


November-December 2022

EFSA and EU Member State experts meet to peer review the updated glyphosate re-review dossier. The AGG will then further review the re-review dossier based on the results of the peer review, after which EFSA will draft the peer review conclusions and conduct follow-up consultations with the AGG and member country experts.


July 2023

The EFSA peer review conclusions will be finalized and made available to the European Commission, Member States and the GRG.

Main participants of EU glyphosate re-evaluation:


Glyphosate Renewal Group, GRG

Assessment Group on Glyphosate, AGG

European Chemicals Agency, ECHA

ECHA’s Committee for Risk Assessment,RAC

European Food Safety Authority, EFSA

Source: ECHA/NR/22/10; REACH24H

Prev: Over 30 Countries Announced a Ban on Exports! A Global Food Crisis Is Approaching!

Next: Mixed fertilization, a trend that adds to the sustainability of agriculture